Download Animal ethics and philosophy : questioning the orthodoxy by Elisa Aaltola, John Hadley PDF

By Elisa Aaltola, John Hadley

Debate in animal ethics wishes reenergizing. up to now, philosophers have taken with a comparatively constrained variety of particular subject matters while leaving metaphilosophical matters that require pressing realization principally unexamined.

This well timed choice of essays brings jointly new conception and important views on key themes in animal ethics, foregrounding questions with regards to ethical prestige, ethical epistemology and ethical psychology. Is an individualistic technique established upon capacities tips on how to flooring the ethical prestige of non-human animals or should still philosophers pursue relational views? What does it suggest to “know” animals and “speak” for them? what's the position of feelings corresponding to disgust, empathy, and love, in animal ethics and the way does emotion tell the rationalism inherent in analytic animal ethics theory?

The assortment goals to increase the scope of animal ethics, rendering it extra which include very important modern philosophical subject matters and pushing the self-discipline in new directions.

Show description

Read or Download Animal ethics and philosophy : questioning the orthodoxy PDF

Similar consciousness & thought books

Subjectivity and Suffering in American Culture: Possible Selves (Culture, Mind and Society)

Winner of The Boyer Prize from the Society for mental Anthropology! !! This publication explores the event of discomfort which will make clear the character of the human self.  utilizing an intimate lifestyles heritage technique, it examines methods humans fight to deal with reports which can shatter their lives: a prognosis of melanoma, the demise of a wife, a parent’s psychological disease.

Minds and Computers: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence

May a working laptop or computer have a brain? what sort of desktop may this be? precisely what will we suggest by way of "mind" besides? The thought of the "intelligent'"machine, whereas carrying on with to add in different pleasing and scary fictions, has additionally been the point of interest of a significant and committed examine culture. Reflecting on those fictions, and at the study culture that pursues "Artificial Intelligence", increases a couple of vexing philosophical concerns.

On the origins of cognitive science - The mechanization of the mind

The conceptual historical past of cognitive technology is still for the main half unwritten. during this groundbreaking e-book, Jean-Pierre Dupuy--one of the important architects of cognitive technological know-how in France--provides a huge bankruptcy: the legacy of cybernetics. opposite to renowned trust, Dupuy argues, cybernetics represented no longer the anthropomorphization of the laptop however the mechanization of the human.

The natural philosophy of Emanuel Swedenborg : a study in the conceptual metaphors of the mechanistic world-view

Even though Emanuel Swedenborg (1688--1772) is usually recognized for his non secular philosophy, his early occupation was once concentrated unnatural technological know-how. in this interval, Swedenborg considered the realm used to be like a big desktop, following the legislation of mechanics and geometry. This quantity analyzes this mechanistic worldview from the cognitive point of view, by way of a research of the metaphors in Swedenborg's texts.

Extra resources for Animal ethics and philosophy : questioning the orthodoxy

Example text

Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2000), who both argue that the property they refer to as “inherent value” is a thoroughgoing categorical property possessed by all bearers equally. I argue above that Regan’s distinction between moral agents and moral patients, which Francione also adopts, is grounds for thinking that, contrary to their assertions, their key value concept does admit of degree. ) But note: even if we accept Regan’s and Francione’s claim that inherent value does not admit of degree, then their theories, like others that maintain the equality of persons, are at odds with the third principle in the triad, the evolution principle.

Secondly, even though it may be possible to claim that without the evolution principle, animal rights theory is still consistent with the spirit (though perhaps not the letter) of Darwinian naturalism, given that they would be seen to be rejecting a contemporary Darwinian orthodoxy, the only option proponents of animal rights theory would have for demonstrating their Darwinian credentials would be rhetorical appeals to the same kind principle. It might be objected that moral groupings like the class of all individuals who possess direct value, and morally significant natural groupings like the class of all individuals who are psychologically complex, are fundamentally different from the kinds that concern philosophers of biology.

Insofar as reasonable partiality is justified, pets provide their caretakers with agent-relative reasons to care for them more than they care for other animals. But the final value of the pet to her related caretaker is justified precisely in virtue of the fact that the relationship instantiates a finally valuable aspect of human and nonhuman lives. My cat and I—or cats and people in general—can benefit from the multispecies community they give rise to, 47 with all the particular features of each relationship (uniqueness, shared history, past commitments) resonating in a distinctive way with the general features of the typical pet-human relationship.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.27 of 5 – based on 14 votes