By Petra Sleeman, Freek Van de Velde, Harry Perridon
Even supposing the Germanic and Romance languages are branches of an analogous language kin and even supposing either have constructed the adjective as a separate syntactic and morphological classification, the syntax, morphology, and interpretation of adjectives is certainly not a similar in those language teams, and there's even version inside all of the language teams. one of many major goals of this quantity is to map the variations and similarities in syntactic habit, morphology, and which means of the Germanic and Romance adjective and to discover a solution to the subsequent query: Are the (dis)similarities the results of self reliant advancements in all of the branches of the Indo-European language family members, or are they attributable to language touch?
Read or Download Adjectives in Germanic and Romance PDF
Best grammar books
This ebook considers the interplay of morphological and phonological determinants of linguistic shape and the measure to which one determines the opposite. It considers the operation of canonical varieties, the invariant syllabic shapes of morphemes and the defining attribute of prosodic morphology. Dr Downing offers an unique thought which she exams on info from a large choice of languages.
Quantity fifty eight of the "North Holland Linguistic Series", edited by way of Virginia Motapanyane, offers an updated review of experiences in Romanian syntax. Bringing jointly linguists operating in the box of generative grammar, the volume's comparative strategy demonstrates the relevance of Romanian facts to grammatical idea.
The current quantity is situated round 5 linguistic subject matters: argument constitution and encoding ideas; argument constitution and verb sessions; unexpressed arguments; cut up intransitivity; and existential and presentational buildings. The articles additionally hide numerous typologically diversified languages, and so they provide new facts from under-researched languages at the problems with occasion and argument constitution.
- On the Nature of Grammatical Relations (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs)
- Child Language (Language Workbooks)
- A Grammar of Egyptian Aramaic, 1st ed. (HdO 32)
- Discourse-Related Features and Functional Projections
Extra resources for Adjectives in Germanic and Romance
As in individual cases such as Engl. to work hard (verb-modification) and Fr. fort bien “very well” (adverb-modification), the high degree of implementation of the canonical quantifiers (12) in the old language was the reason why they have resisted the ascension of Type B quantifiers in diachrony. g. It should be incandescently clear, Martin Luther King; example from Bolinger). 3 Sentential adverbs and discourse markers An analogous situation characterizes the domain of sentential adverbs and discourse markers:6 (13) sure/surely .
283–319. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Emonds, Joe. 1976. A Transformational Approach to English Syntax: Root, Structure-Preserving and Local Transformations. New York NY: Academic Press. Enger, Hans-Olav. 2013. Morphological theory and grammaticalisation: The role of meaning and local generalisations. Language Sciences 36: 18–31. Faarlund, Jan Terje. 1994. Old and Middle Scandinavian. In The Germanic Languages, Ekkehard König & Johan van der Auwera (eds), 38–71. London: Routledge. Faarlund, Jan Terje.
Terriblement grand “terribly big” which uses the concept ‘terrible’ as a metaphor for the intensification of an adjective (cf. Engl. terribly big). As in individual cases such as Engl. to work hard (verb-modification) and Fr. fort bien “very well” (adverb-modification), the high degree of implementation of the canonical quantifiers (12) in the old language was the reason why they have resisted the ascension of Type B quantifiers in diachrony. g. It should be incandescently clear, Martin Luther King; example from Bolinger).